
by David Grann
A Nonfiction, 2018 by Vintage, 416 Pages
What I Didn’t Like:
- Although I’m a true crime and nonfiction fan, this one had a very dry start. The first chronicle especially reads like a textbook loaded with names and facts. It’s cold and distant.
- The job of a good true crime is to sort through the research and present it in a comprehensive way. This almost overloads that research to confuse. It’s a lot of facts, dates, names, and people. It comes at you fast and without the benefit of a filter. Sometimes you’re taken on a tangent to discuss something completely different. It makes it hard to follow the flow of information.
- There’s no real connection with any one character here. No one emerges as a main character. Possibly because it contains so many characters, there’s none to specifically latch onto.
What I Did Like:
- The research is obviously well done and detailed. There’s no doubt the author knows what has happened here and is reporting what he has learned accurately.
- The embedded lessons of greed and corruption are important. Additionally, an attempt has been made to give a voice to those involved. It’s an important topic.
Who Should Read This One:
- Fans of historical novels that focus on facts, not people. If you want comprehensive research on the topic, this is your book.
- I will note that the movie likely focuses more heavily on the people involved and the second chronicle specifically, which means they’ll have different vibes. I could be wrong, of course.
My Rating: 3 Stars
- An important topic but a telling that lacks heart.


Leave a Reply